Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Linux Graphics / X.Org Drivers > X.Org & Mesa

X.Org & Mesa Discussion of X.Org and Mesa / Gallium3D. This includes the discussion of the X Server, RandR, OpenGL, Kernel-based Mode-Setting, and other X components not covered by other forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2008, 02:40 PM
phoronix phoronix is offline
Phoronix News Bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,103
Default X Server 1.4.1 Is Released, No Joke

Phoronix: X Server 1.4.1 Is Released, No Joke

Today -- just 212 days after the planned November launch date -- X Server 1.4.1 is finally released! Daniel Stone announced its release this morning on the xorg mailing list. X Server 1.4.1 has had 62 changes to it since the 1.4.1 pre-release, and that release had 46 changes, which brings the change total for this release up to 108. Even though X Server 1.4.1 has more than 100 changes, it wasn't enough to clear out the blocker bug, which still has two open bugs.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=12459
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2008, 05:01 PM
gQuigs gQuigs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 11
Default

Just curious, does anyone else think that Xorg would attract more volunteer developers if it was using a copyleft license, possibly LGPL?

Stallman actually says X not being copyleft is a good thing, so I really might be alone in this opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2008, 05:28 PM
Regenwald Regenwald is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 143
Default

sad, sad. x11/xorg is an essential part of every linuxdistri. i don't understand why there are only such few devs. a slim & fast xserver with mpx is necessary for mulittouchscreens, umpcs, mobile phones and if you read news ticker, nearly every company plans to release touch screens etc. so how would they use them if xorg isn't able to handle them?

besides, i've read some articles about the "inner values" from xorg. a lot of latency time seems to come from the singlethreaded x11. it doesn't execute thing parallel, it does arange them (fifo) and execute them sucessively. this results in a latency time => "laggy" gui (and there are other reasons such as the x11 protocoll itself). plan 9 once had a x11-server which was massively multithreaded. perhaps this is a good idea...

i would like to see that someone moderns xorg-internals so that we all could use our dual-/quad/whatever-cores for a fast xserver with proper acceleration and a modern way to thread gpus. just think of opencl (apple "released" it yesterday, i liked the idea, perhaps something for linux/gallium, too?)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2008, 05:55 PM
seba seba is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18
Default

really sad, X is the second most important component on a Linux distribution but yet it doesn't get the support that it needs. IMHO Vendors should put more effort on X development.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-10-2008, 06:08 PM
[Knuckles] [Knuckles] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
Default

Same opinion here -- X.org has been a very big step up from the decaying Xfree86, but desktop distros like ubuntu, opensuse and others should try to contribute more for its development, as it has a key role in a linux desktop. Red hat is an excellent example here, their contributions have been very important.

On the other hand, I'm still rather amazed at the great work the X.org team does, even with very few contributors. Kudos to you all, and take my (our?) comments as "we need more people" and not "you are doing it wrong!".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2008, 05:16 AM
yoshi314 yoshi314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PL
Posts: 791
Default

i think X needs more support from companies developing products for linux. if a few more of these companies would provide one dedicated developer for X things would be way better (maybe except for those political arguments).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2008, 10:47 AM
henne henne is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [Knuckles] View Post
desktop distros like ubuntu, opensuse and others should try to contribute more
Egbert Eich, employed since ages at SUSE. Sits even in the Board.
http://egbert-e.livejournal.com/

Stefan Dirsch, SUSE X maintainer. You cant find X.org releasenotes without special thanks to him.

Matthias Hopf, payed by SUSE since 2004
http://emmes.livejournal.com/

Luc Verhaegen, newest X developer on SUSE payroll.
http://libv.livejournal.com/

and there are even more people payed by SUSE that contribute in one or the other way to X.org.

You might want to rethink your opinion about openSUSE.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2008, 12:17 PM
kingttx kingttx is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
Default Most visible project doesn't get much love

In a twist of irony, X11 is literally the most visible part of GNU/Linux and just doesn't get much love overall. It's like giving more attention to a car on the road than the road itself. You don't have a good road, you won't like driving ANY car over it ... except maybe a 4x4.

This is one project that does need some money thrown at it to attract more talent. I'm sure the developers there (paid and unpaid) would really like some relief.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2008, 12:51 PM
[Knuckles] [Knuckles] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
Default

@henne: You're completely right, so now opensuse has been removed from my "doesn't help much" mental list to the "does good work" one

And yeah opensuse rules, it's what I use on my desktop every day!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2008, 01:53 PM
conholster conholster is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Based on the comments here and in the article you'd think there are no improvments or any real changes in the new release. Is this so or are most of you just concentrating on the 'bad' things?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.