Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support

    Phoronix: GParted 0.20 Improves Btrfs Support

    For those in need of open-source file-system/partition management, the wonderful GParted program has been updated to v0.20.0...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    How has gparted not breached 1.0 yet? It was released over 10 years ago - what else does it need to officially be considered stable?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
      How has gparted not breached 1.0 yet? It was released over 10 years ago - what else does it need to officially be considered stable?
      Development Plans for the Next Release of GParted (0.21.0) (Page 1) — General Development — GParted forum — Support forum for users of GParted and the GParted Live media


      Appearently GTK 3.0 support.

      Comment


      • #4
        Just want to point out that v.19.1-4 is still the most recent 'stable' version. I think gparted is an incredible utility but I'm also not very adventurous so I'd be judicious about v.20, at least regarding boxes I rely on to be stable and can't do without.

        Comment


        • #5
          QParted?

          Just out of curiosity, will there be a QParted or maybe a revival of QtParted? Ubuntu uses Qt in the future, so does LXQt.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by WorBlux View Post
            Appearently GTK 3.0 support.
            That was awfully sage of them to pick that as a criteria way before gtk3 existed

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
              How has gparted not breached 1.0 yet? It was released over 10 years ago - what else does it need to officially be considered stable?
              Exactly my thoughts when I read the article? I?ve been using it for years and never had a problem with it.

              I?m sad that they are considering Gtk3 though. Gtk3 just sucks.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sacridex View Post
                Just out of curiosity, will there be a QParted or maybe a revival of QtParted? Ubuntu uses Qt in the future, so does LXQt.
                I know that I'm not really answering your question but GParted doesn't really have that many dependencies; just gtkmm, gtk, and parted (plus filesystem support tools such as dofstools). Plus, it's extremely stable and reliable. Whereas, KDE Partition Manager is a lot younger and (judging from its CMakeLists.txt) depends on Tier 4 KDE Frameworks .

                Comment


                • #9
                  The reason I would want a qt version of parted is because gtk apps have a tendency of looking really out of place and/or ugly outside of gnome or xfce.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by sacridex View Post
                    Just out of curiosity, will there be a QParted or maybe a revival of QtParted? Ubuntu uses Qt in the future, so does LXQt.
                    KDE has a very full-featured partition editor. It should work fine in LXQt, especially once it is ported to frameworks 5.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X