Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Hardware > Motherboards & Chipsets

Motherboards & Chipsets Discuss everything from sever to mini-ITX motherboards and chipsets.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2007, 11:01 PM
DoubleG DoubleG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Troy
Posts: 8
Default Dell Precision 670: POST Test failure after restart from Red Hat 9.0

I am being paid to get some software working on a Dell Precision 670 workstation using a dual-boot config between Windows and Red Hat 9.0 (yeah, I wanted to use something newer, but the contract requires me to use RH9 for this project much to my dismay). Here are the system specs:

Dual Xeon processors (3.0GHz or 3.2...don't remember which)
4gb RAM
40gb IDE hard drive (Linux drive)
Quadro FX 4400

Anyway, to make the ancient Linux distro see half the hardware (including the network card and USB), I had to roll out a compile of a newer version of the 2.4 kernel (2.4.33.6). After lengthy configuration (over a dozen recompiles) and headache, the system saw my stuff. I got the program running, and it looked like I was good to go.

However, the problem I am having now is that the computer is failing the POST test when I restart the computer out of Linux. The beep code indicates a "DRAM Refresh Error" of some sort. I have never seen this happen restarting from Windows -- only from Linux. I have absolutely no idea what could cause this to happen, but the only thing I can really do to make the computer start up again is unplug it, wait about a minute, and then cold-boot it. My best guess is that something in the Linux kernel isn't cleaning up nicely (I had to use a couple things in the kernel labelled "Experimental" to get USB working properly) and corrupting something before giving up control of the computer to the BIOS.

Have any of you guys ever seen a computer fail to POST from a restart? If so, do you have any suggestions on how to fix it? It's a really cryptic problem.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2007, 10:45 AM
Michael Michael is offline
Phoronix
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,564
Default

Had you tried the 2.4.34.1 kernel? That would be my only possible suggestion off hand. I've never come across that problem before, but none of my machines use the 2.4 kernel any longer.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.