Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Linux Graphics / X.Org Drivers > VIA / S3 Graphics Linux

VIA / S3 Graphics Linux Technical support and discussion of the open-source VIA strategy and Linux drivers. The discussion of S3 Graphics is also recommended for this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2009, 08:50 PM
phoronix phoronix is offline
Phoronix News Bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,103
Default S3 Graphics Releases Linux Driver With OpenGL 3.0, VA-API

Phoronix: S3 Graphics Releases Linux Driver With OpenGL 3.0, VA-API

For months we have seen S3 Graphics advertise a magical Linux driver in their press releases that promised to offer OpenGL 3.0 support and advanced video functionality. They had reported to us the driver would be released in December, but that deadline had passed and they continued to announce Linux support when launching the Chrome 540 GTX, but still there was nothing. However, S3 Graphics has now actually delivered such a driver! They have delivered a Chrome 500 series Linux driver that not only provides OpenGL 3.0 support but also H.264, VC-1, and MPEG-2 hardware decoding on the GPU. While it may appear to be good, this driver is still far from perfect.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13546
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:22 PM
cruiseoveride cruiseoveride is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 140
Default

damn, even S3 is pwn'ing ATi
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:26 PM
Kano Kano is offline
Debian Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,897
Default

I guess nobody really tested that card with Linux yet. The drivers are 32 bit only and contain a binary blob for the kernel module. So they have to change the licence for it to S3 or whatever - at least not GPL.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:33 PM
RobbieAB RobbieAB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 222
Default

All the same...

Where is the flying pig picture?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:44 PM
nico342 nico342 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 24
Default

What's happen ATI ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:44 PM
DanL DanL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruiseoveride View Post
damn, even S3 is pwn'ing ATi
fglrx isn't the greatest, but if you really believe S3's drivers are better, then I've got some ocean-front property in Bolivia I'd like to sell you.

Or maybe you're just a frustrated ATI customer that wanted to take a shot at ATI...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:00 PM
TechMage89 TechMage89 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 310
Default

I seriously think that any claims by s3 at this point should be taken with a grain of salt. The fact that their decidedly closed-source driver modules report themselves as GPL ought to tell you something.

If there's someone with a Chrome 500 who can test this driver, *then* maybe we can find out how well it actually works and what its actual capabilities are.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2009, 01:50 AM
conholster conholster is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Who makes gfx cards based S3 chips? I wanna try.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2009, 01:56 AM
Thetargos Thetargos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Posts: 840
Default

I hope that soon enough, you'll be able to test the driver, and the hardware on Linux, Michael. I'd really be interested in seeing how well it performs, how does it compare to the earlier tests you ran on cheap hardware and nVidia GFX with VDPAU and how well does it do 3D compared to Intel, nVidia and ATi (on reasonably similar hardware... Do we even know how many stream processors the 500 series pack or if it has a vertex engine? How about memory interface, etc?)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2009, 02:41 AM
stan stan is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 81
Default

S3 is already violating the GPL by distributing the binary without the source. They obviously need to claim it's GPL in order to use Linux's GPL'ed symbols. So now it's up to someone who owns copyright to the Linux kernel to sue their behind.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.