![]() |
|
|||||||
| NVIDIA Linux Both NVIDIA's closed-source and open-source drivers can be discussed here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi all!
I have an asus a8j laptop with core 2 duo 1.66ghz and gf7300. Software is ubuntu fiesty 7.04 x86-64 (linux 2.6.20) and nvidia drivers 9755. I tested some opengl apps and wonder low framerate. I decided to compare linux vs windows performance on my laptop. In windows i installed dx9 and nvidia 85.06 drivers (don't found newest version). Downloaded from http://ioquake3.org/ windows and 64 bit linux version of quake3 binaries, also using the same pak0.pk3 file. Results: Win2k: 640/normal - 480fps, 1024/allmax - 215fps Linux: 640/normal - 320fps, 1024/allmax - 150fps For exclude cpu i tested also compressing with lame 3.97: Win2k - 24s. Linux - 26s. Lame in windows is a little faster, but not 40%. I tried: 1. Latest 2.6.21 kernel, whithout any drivers/modules, only that needed too boot my system and launch ogl app. 2. Performance governon on cpu instead ondemand. 3. Cheking via nvidia-settings that gpu and mem frequency in 3d tasks switching to 350/700. 4. 9631 nvidia drivers version. 5. Disabling composite extension. Oh don't know what that may be, look like some kind of powersave technology. Also i found friends with asus laptops like my - asus lamborghini vx1 and w7j (gentoo/2.6.20/9755) - all have low framerate. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anybody may confirm or deny this results? Or such performance is a normal for current linux drivers and gf 7300 ( because performance of the gfti4200 was identical in linux/windows )?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
actually my friend bought himself an gf 7650 GT or something around 7x50 GT (don't remember too well) and he has very bad performance even on windows. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|