![]() |
|
|||||||
| Desktop Linux Discussion of Linux on the desktop. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
BitTorrent and uTorrent have joined forces today, for what both companies envision will be the best BitTorrent client. BitTorrent of course offers an official Linux version of its software, while uTorrent is Windows-only (at this time). This leads me to wonder... with today's announcement will this eventually lead to an official uTorrent client for Linux?
uTorrent is reported to work with Cedega (not WINE), and KTorrent is already very nice, but what do you hope for as a Linux user out of today's announcement? Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great. I really hope we'll get a Linux version, I've asked Ludde about this many times and he always said once he is satisfied with the Windows builds he'll start porting the program to other O.S. It also helps that I've donated $ 100 to give him further incentive...
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't really see a good point in a company (or whatever else entity) abandon a neatly working, cross platform, free software solution to a problem in favour of a proprietary, win32-only one.
For GNU/Linux, there's KTorrent, as Michael already stated in the initial posts, and it's doing perfectly fine, whilst being free.
__________________
Free Software. Free Society. Better Lives. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Screw uTorrent. Like heck I want to use a client thats essentially is tight with the MPAA. I like to download in private.
KTorrent is the only option for Linux, unless you want the Java-whoring Azureus. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really hope they do, or at least make a worthy GTK+ client. Right now Deluge isn't bad, but the resource consumption is insane! Some improvement in this area is desperately needed.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Trasmission rullz... if you want to download the whole torrent
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I use Azureus which isn't so bad but I'm open to try Ktorrent.
I hope uTorrent releases a Linux version. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
most programmers just go the easy way, making their software bloated by borrowing as much code as possible from existing solutions, to avoid writing as much code as possible, or just because some other programming language is easier to write the app with. ("why should we care? today's hardware will take it"). but since utorrent got that 'corporate' feel, i got a change of heart about it. oh well, i don't use windows anymore anyway :] i'm a linux console freak, and rtorrent is my client of choice. it keeps it dependencies to reasonable minimum (curl, sigc++, ncurses), and the client is small and fast, with pretty efficient ncurses ui. if you think it's too bloated for you - maybe ctorrent is what you need :] it doesn't have all the features of utorrent (dht, rss is missing, maybe some kind of scheduling as well) but it's going forward at a somewhat steady rate. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|