![]() |
|
|||||||
| Processors & Memory Discuss both AMD and Intel processors (CPUs) and system memory. Cooling products for processors and overclocking can also be discussed. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
8 x 512MB FBD-533 on 4 channels:
PHORONIX copy: 2014.77 PHORONIX Scale: 2016.36 PHORONIX Add: 1985.11 For comparison, here is results from my dual 5160 (3GHz) 4x2GB FBD-667 using 4 channels on 5000X: ramspeed 2.4.1 UP compiled for i686: INTEGER BatchRun Copy: 2414.22 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Scale: 2334.57 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Add: 2122.86 Mb/s Here are results using 2 and 4 cores, respectively: ramsmp 3.3.1 SMP compiled for i686 -p2: INTEGER BatchRun Copy: 3990.67 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Scale: 3884.67 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Add: 3661.25 Mb/s ramsmp 3.3.1 SMP compiled for i686 -p4: INTEGER BatchRun Copy: 3985.57 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Scale: 3942.61 Mb/s INTEGER BatchRun Add: 3503.89 Mb/s The tech docs for my S5000XVN say "Peak theoretical memory data bandwidth is 6.4GB/s with DDR2-533 and 8.0GB/s with DDR2-667." It would be interesting to see if the quad cores can get any closer to that. Also, notice how 2 cores nearly doubled the throughput, but 4 cores didn't do anything. So, I would say your results are cpu-limited and you aren't giving an accurate picture of maximum performance. Last edited by fphillips; 12-17-2006 at 03:10 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
A reader submitted the story to Digg: http://digg.com/hardware/Intel_Quad_...ry_Performance
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Awesome performance. If I was still into desktops/workstations I'd definitely grab one of those monsters...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|