Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Linux Graphics / X.Org Drivers > NVIDIA Linux

NVIDIA Linux Both NVIDIA's closed-source and open-source drivers can be discussed here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2007, 07:10 PM
phoronix phoronix is offline
Phoronix News Bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,102
Default NVIDIA 169.04 Driver Improvements

Phoronix: NVIDIA 169.04 Driver Improvements

Last week NVIDIA introduced the 169.04 Beta Linux driver for their GeForce and Quadro graphics cards. This X.Org driver contained a number of GeForce 8 fixes, initial support for the GeForce 8800GT graphics card, monitoring of PowerMizer state information, and other changes. What we had not tested, however, at that time was a performance comparison of the new driver and the previous 100.14.23 driver. The undocumented fact we have found is that this 169.04 Beta driver does deliver performance improvements for the GeForce 8 series on Linux.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11476
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2007, 08:08 PM
zbiggy zbiggy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Default

The most cool feature of this release is XRender improvement. Speed up is very very much visible in render_bench application. In some tests it is up to 128x speed increase on Geforce 6150. I feel that since 169.04 work in KDE 2D desktop is much more comfortable.

169.04 is the best driver since release when XvMC was introduced.

The sad thing about Phoronix and all other IT news site or newspapers are 3D tests only. I would like to see some day feature review of GPUs in terms of video and 2D performance/features.
(XRender; XAA; EXA; Xv max resolution , image formats; XvMC accelerated movie formats; DPMS)

It would be interesting if recent 169.04 Nvidia driven hardware is faster in 2D than Matrox Parhelia with recent mtx driver, Radeon with recent fglrx driver, S3 chrome 20 with recently released Linux driver (it is initial release but with XvMC !!!) or Intel.

There are test tools for 2D:
render_bench (XRender performance)
x11perf
xvinfo to check what Xv caps are
xvmcinfo app to check XvMC caps
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2007, 05:48 AM
remm remm is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 107
Default

I think we can thank ATI for these recent improvements
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2007, 03:09 AM
lenrek lenrek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remm View Post
I think we can thank ATI for these recent improvements
I am not so sure about that...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2007, 06:03 AM
Redeeman Redeeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zbiggy View Post
The most cool feature of this release is XRender improvement. Speed up is very very much visible in render_bench application. In some tests it is up to 128x speed increase on Geforce 6150. I feel that since 169.04 work in KDE 2D desktop is much more comfortable.

169.04 is the best driver since release when XvMC was introduced.

The sad thing about Phoronix and all other IT news site or newspapers are 3D tests only. I would like to see some day feature review of GPUs in terms of video and 2D performance/features.
(XRender; XAA; EXA; Xv max resolution , image formats; XvMC accelerated movie formats; DPMS)

It would be interesting if recent 169.04 Nvidia driven hardware is faster in 2D than Matrox Parhelia with recent mtx driver, Radeon with recent fglrx driver, S3 chrome 20 with recently released Linux driver (it is initial release but with XvMC !!!) or Intel.

There are test tools for 2D:
render_bench (XRender performance)
x11perf
xvinfo to check what Xv caps are
xvmcinfo app to check XvMC caps
xvinfo says maximum size is 2046 x 2046

i have a few questions regarding this..

is this the maximum size of video which you can play back via xv, or is it the maximum OUTPUT of xv? what i mean is, if i have a monitor capable of 2560x1600, and i for example attempt to play 1920x1080 video, will xv be unable to scale the 1080p video up to 2560x1440? or is it just that the video resolution i input may max be 2046x2046?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2007, 07:43 AM
Moustacha Moustacha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 128
Default

It means the largest display size it can handle is 2046x2046
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2007, 07:57 PM
Redeeman Redeeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 370
Default

do you know if it can handle more on a card supporting dual-link dvi? otherwise it kindof sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2008, 04:43 PM
Vadi Vadi is offline
Phoronix Test Suite Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 461
Default

Does the video card adaptively decide when I needs to go on a higher performance level? Because I couldn't find an option to set it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.