Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Phoronix > Phoronix Test Suite

Phoronix Test Suite Discussion & collaboration on the Phoronix Test Suite software and specification.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2008, 04:49 AM
Thetargos Thetargos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Posts: 840
Default Nexuiz test

Just installed PTS-0.6 and tried to run the Nexuiz test, however and even though the game is installed on my system, PTS complaints that it is not. Now I tried to see what binary is PTS actually calling, as Nexuiz as installed by the package manager of my distro (Fedora 8) has at least three binaries: nexuiz-glx, nexuiz-sdl and nexuiz-sdl-wrapper, how and where do I change this? The launcher for Nexuiz in the menu points to nexuiz-sdl-wrapper, without making a symlink to "nexuiz" in /usr/bin, what could I do to for example have way to test both nexuiz-glx and nexuiz-sdl performance?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2008, 07:21 AM
Michael Michael is offline
Phoronix
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4,559
Default

You would change it inside pts/test-resources/nexuiz/install.sh. By default, when doing a local install, it will go with nexuiz-glx.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2008, 08:12 AM
Kano Kano is online now
Debian Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,894
Default

Well when I tested speed with nexuiz it was different with precompiled binaries or distro specific packages because of 2 things:

a) Debian compiled the binary with debug enabled -> really much slower (I compiled the binary for Kanotix without debug just like the standard release). Please test if Fedora uses debug enabled Nexuiz or not.
b) A splitted package without music is FASTER than without music, as long as you bench with sound. Because of this I added a specific check for the music, maybe you have to add a different one for Fedora.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2008, 01:29 PM
Thetargos Thetargos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Posts: 840
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano View Post
Well when I tested speed with nexuiz it was different with precompiled binaries or distro specific packages because of 2 things:

a) Debian compiled the binary with debug enabled -> really much slower (I compiled the binary for Kanotix without debug just like the standard release). Please test if Fedora uses debug enabled Nexuiz or not.
b) A splitted package without music is FASTER than without music, as long as you bench with sound. Because of this I added a specific check for the music, maybe you have to add a different one for Fedora.
Interesting. I know that Fedora does to a degree build with debugging (I think), but they rely on different packages to actually provide the debug symbols. I'm not sure how different performance of these binaries is compared to the "official" release... I will certainly check as this does gives some incentive to do so
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.