AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 19 July 2023 at 09:00 AM EDT. Page 8 of 9. 31 Comments.
OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: RSA4096. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: RSA4096. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.
OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: SHA256. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: SHA512. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OpenSSL benchmark with settings of Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

The AMD EPYC 9754 was also performing very well for more conventional workloads like OpenSSL.

Xmrig benchmark with settings of Variant: Wownero, Hash Count: 1M. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
Xmrig benchmark with settings of Variant: Wownero, Hash Count: 1M. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
Xmrig benchmark with settings of Variant: Wownero, Hash Count: 1M. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

Xmrig mining was also great with Bergamo.

RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Read While Writing. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
Sysbench benchmark with settings of Test: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

Overall I was very pleased with the performance provided by the 128-core EPYC 9754 server processors and extremely pleased by the power efficiency advantages over Genoa(X) and managing to widen the lead even further compared to Sapphire Rapids in many workloads.


Related Articles
Ampere Computing 2024 Roadmap Update: 256 Core 3nm CPU In 2025
Benchmarking The First RISC-V Cloud Server: Scaleway EM-RV1 Performance
AMD Announces Ryzen PRO 8840 & PRO 8000G Series CPUs
Intel Announces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator, Intel Xeon 6 Brand
AMD Zen 4 vs. Zen 4C Performance, Zen 4C Core Scaling With Ryzen 5 8500G
Intel Core i3 14100 / i5 14500 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 8500G / 8600G In 500+ Benchmarks