AMD 4th Gen EPYC 9654 "Genoa" AVX-512 Performance Analysis

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 19 December 2022 at 10:00 AM EST. Page 9 of 9. 66 Comments.
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

AVX-512 was also of benefit in other areas written to make use of the extensions like with simdjson for very high performance JSON parsing.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison
AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

Genoa's AVX-512 presence was also very beneficial for the OpenFOAM 10 computational fluid dynamics software.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

The CP2K molecular dynamics software enjoyed marginally improved performance with AVX-512.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

More than 130 benchmarks in full were run for this AVX-512 comparison on AMD 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" with the flagship EPYC 9654 processors.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

Over that wide span of AVX-512-capable benchmarks, Zen 4's AVX-512 implementation led to a 35% increase in performance overall. But as shown from the wide range of workloads tested, the benefits of AVX-512 can vary quite a bit from small gains in areas like faster JSON parsing with simdjson to massive performance improvements with various AI / deep learning software like TensorFlow, OpenVINO, and others. Many Intel oneAPI rendering toolkit components optimized for AVX-512 also benefited greatly from AVX-512 on AMD Genoa processors.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

The good news is that even with the massive performance gains from utilizing AVX-512, there was no significant difference in the EPYC 9654 2P power consumption. One interesting characteristic is that when AVX-512 was enabled, in the brief moments of idle between test runs or between different benchmarks, the CPU power consumption was able to hit a lower power state than when AVX-512 was forced off. And in some light workloads the AVX-512 usage also showed lower power use than without AVX-512.

AMD EPYC 4th Gen AVX-512 Comparison

Unlike early generations of AVX-512 enabled Intel CPUs, the EPYC 9654 CPU temperature didn't experience elevated temperatures when running all these AVX-512-capable workloads nor was there the CPU frequency impairment.

So like with the AVX-512 findings previously published for AMD Ryzen 7000 series, the AMD 4th Gen EPYC "Genoa" AVX-512 results are stellar and part of the reason for the terrific generational uplift from AMD EPYC 7003 Milan(X) and the very strong showing against current Intel Xeon Scalable "Ice Lake" processors. Benchmarks looking at other areas of the EPYC Genoa performance under Linux continue to be worked on at Phoronix.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.