AMD P-State v4 Linux Testing On A Ryzen 5 5500U

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 24 November 2021 at 09:15 AM EST. Page 2 of 5. 14 Comments.
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing

When using the "performance" governor for running the Jetstream 2 benchmark in Google Chrome, the "performance" governor was yielding quite similar between drivers as would be expected with generally keeping the processor in its highest performance state. But when it came to the ondemand and schedutil governors, amd-pstate was trailing acpi-cpufreq for the raw performance. For the powersave governor, amd-pstate also trailed acpi-cpufreq.

AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing

During this benchmark, using the amd-pstate driver with ondemand/schedutil did save about 0.4 Watts compared to acpi-cpufreq....

AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing

On a performance-per-Watt basis, this put amd-pstate ondemand out in front followed immediately by acpi-cpufreq in its ondemand configuration.

AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing

Aside from when in powersave mode where the CPU performance state was at a minimum, for this laptop wasn't much of a difference between governors and drivers for this Lenovo laptop.

AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing
AMD P-State Linux Driver vs. CPUFreq Testing

For ET: Legacy, Xonotic, and Tesseract among other open-source games, the results were quite close. Powersave led to much lower performance but with leading power efficiency.


Related Articles