GCC 6.2 vs. Clang 3.9 Compiler Performance On Clear Linux With Intel Kaby Lake

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 17 November 2016 at 10:40 AM EST. Page 4 of 4. 5 Comments.

GCC 6.2.0 was also much faster with the C-Ray multi-threaded ray-tracer.

While Clang was faster with Crafty.

The LAME MP3 performance was close to the same.

The tests ended out with Clang outperforming GCC with the OpenSSL benchmark.

Clang 3.9 on Clear Linux did win in a number of tests while GCC still also dominates in a number of benchmarks too. Perhaps most surprising from these benchmark results today were the compilation times with GCC 6.2 compiling code significantly quicker than Clang 3.9. More results on OpenBenchmarking.org or run your own compiler comparisons with the Phoronix Test Suite.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.