Intel P-State vs. CPUFreq Benchmarks On The i7-5960X

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 18 September 2014 at 02:10 PM EDT. Page 3 of 3. 11 Comments.

When it came to measuring the time to build the Linux kernel, the ACPI CPUFreq driver with performance governor was the fastest and did better than the P-State driver.

Oddly for C-Ray and building the Linux kernel, the P-State powersave mode was faster than the performance governor.

Audio encoding was greatly impacted by the various CPU frequency scaling drivers on the Linux 3.17 kernel.

More of these CPU frequency scaling tests can be found on OpenBenchmarking.org along with the other articles linked from the first page of this article. Overall, using the performance scaling driver is still certainly the best for those wanting to maximize the performance potential. Between P-State and ACPI CPUFreq there wasn't much of a difference except in some cases the CPUFeq driver did better than Intel's custom scaling driver.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.