Linux 4.0 Hard Drive Comparison With EXT4 / Btrfs / XFS / NTFS / NILFS2 / ReiserFS

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 8 April 2015 at 11:00 AM EDT. Page 3 of 4. 28 Comments.

FS-Mark's 1000 files of 1MB size test saw NILFS2 strike a win followed by XFS and then EXT4.

When FS-Mark was dealing with multiple threads, EXT4 jumped out as the winner followed by NILFS2.

In the final FS-Mark test, NILFS2 marked another victory.


Related Articles
Intel Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" Performance Improves With Linux 6.9
GCC 14 vs. LLVM Clang 18 Compiler Performance On Fedora 40
Intel Xeon Max Sees Some Performance Gains For OpenVINO & ONNX With Linux 6.9
Linux 6.9 Drives AMD 4th Gen EPYC Performance Even Higher For Some Workloads
Intel Core Ultra "Meteor Lake" Yields Faster Performance With Linux 6.9
Google Cloud's C3D Instances Provide Strong Performance Value For PingCAP's TiDB