OpenSUSE Leap 42.1 vs. Leap 42.2 vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 23 November 2016 at 04:14 AM EST. Page 4 of 4. 14 Comments.
openSUSE 42.1 vs. 42.2 Leap vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks

Clear Linux edges out with Hiemno.

openSUSE 42.1 vs. 42.2 Leap vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks
openSUSE 42.1 vs. 42.2 Leap vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks

OpenSUSE Leap 42.2 was the fastest of the bunch for the compile times, in part due to sticking to GCC 4.8. Clear Linux is the slowest since all of its default CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS prolong the build process due to greater optimizations.

openSUSE 42.1 vs. 42.2 Leap vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks
openSUSE 42.1 vs. 42.2 Leap vs. Tumbleweed Benchmarks

Those are the latest openSUSE Linux benchmarking numbers I have available. Some more results can be found via this OpenBenchmarking.org result file. Overall, it appears the openSUSE Leap 42.2 performance is better than Leap 42.1, including rather significant gains for some of the benchmarks. However, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed was still faster in many of the benchmarks compared to Leap 42.2 while Intel's Clear Linux shows what is possible when having a Linux distribution that's very minded about ultimate performance and willing to ship with rather aggressive defaults for optimal Linux performance.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.