New Linux Benchmarks Of SilverStone's HDDBOOST

Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 10 September 2010 at 07:14 AM EDT. Page 2 of 2. 16 Comments.

Compressing a 2GB file with the SilverStone HDDBOOST setup was also faster than using the Seagate HDD or OCZ Vertex 2, but the original Vertex was actually the fastest by a small lead.

The Compile Bench performance with the HDDBOOST did improve significantly with it being 80% faster than a solo SSD while just 8% faster than the Seagate ST3320620AS HDD.

In not all disk benchmarks though does the HDDBOOST performance improve, but in SQLite (along with PostgreSQL) database tests there was not much of an improvement over the HDD, which is actually much slower than using a single SSD for such a workload. While this product can increase your read speed and decrease your write times, these results show that higher-end SSDs will continue to trump this in terms of performance. It's nice that the HDDBOOST retails for only $50 USD (at Amazon.com or NewEgg.com), but at the same time you will still need to pickup a solid-state drive and hard drive. At least though this time around with our SilverStone HDDBOOST testing there was not any slowdowns when using this unique product.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.