GLAMOR + RadeonSI 2D Acceleration Is Quite Good For Open-Source AMD 2D Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 29 April 2015 at 12:18 PM EDT. Page 3 of 3. 19 Comments.
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance
2D RadeonSI vs. Catalyst X.Org Performance

With the many GtkPerf micro-benchmark results, the RadeonSI Gallium3D driver with GLAMOR tended to run fine for both the Radeon R9 290 and Radeon R9 270X from AMD. However, in some of the benchmarks the RadeonSI Gallium3D driver tended to be significantly slower than Catalyst.

What's been your 2D desktop Linux experience been like? Share it with us and others in our forums by commenting on this article. Hopefully these results were of some use to those that have requested more recent 2D benchmark results.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.