1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Ubuntu 11.10 vs. Fedora 16: Boot Speed, Power Consumption

Michael Larabel

Published on 23 November 2011
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - 14 Comments

In this article is the first of several articles comparing the recently released Fedora 16 to Ubuntu 11.10. This first article is looking at the boot performance and power consumption from several different notebooks when performing clean installs of Fedora Verne and Ubuntu Oneiric Ocelot.

There are several significant differences between Ubuntu 11.10 and Fedora 16 that make for an interesting comparison. Fedora 16 is shipping with the Linux 3.1 kernel and the GNOME 3.2.1 desktop, including the GNOME Shell. Fedora 16 also furthers its integration with the much talked about systemd init service, after it made its premiere with Fedora 15. Fedora also ships with the bleeding-edge Linux graphics stack. Meanwhile, Ubuntu 11.10 shipped last month with the Linux 3.0 kernel and some GNOME 3.0 packages around Canonical's Unity desktop. Ubuntu has no plans in the foreseeable future to abandon Upstart in favor of systemd. Both Fedora 16 and Ubuntu 11.10 have some similarities like both using GCC 4.6 and sticking to the EXT4 file-system by default for now.

The battery testing and power consumption comparison is being done from a Lenovo ThinkPad T61, ASUS Eee PC, and Lenovo ThinkPad W510 to represent a few popular notebook/netbook configurations on the market.

Linux desktop performance benchmarks and other articles are forthcoming.

The boot speed was measured using Bootchart and for each clean install of the 64-bit version of Ubuntu 11.10 and Fedora 16, the Phoronix user was set to automatic log-in. All other distribution settings were at their defaults. Each system rebooted three times before capturing the Bootchart result.

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
  2. AMD Radeon R9 290 Open-Source Driver Works, But Has A Ways To Go
  3. Trying The Configurable 45 Watt TDP With AMD's A10-7800 / A6-7400K
  4. Sumo's Omni Gets Reloaded
Latest Linux Articles
  1. 20-Way Radeon Comparison With Open-Source Graphics For Steam On Linux Gaming
  2. Preview: OS X 10.10 Yosemite vs. Ubuntu Linux GPU Performance
  3. Radeon Graphics Yield Mixed Results With Linux 3.17 Kernel
  4. AMD's RadeonSI Driver Sped Up A Lot This Summer
Latest Linux News
  1. Plasma Active Is Mostly Ported To KDE Frameworks 5
  2. Google Chrome 37 Brings Many Security Fixes
  3. MenuetOS Updated With SMP Threads & Onscreen Keyboard
  4. Mesa Has A New Release Manager
  5. Enlightenment E19 Lands Its New Wayland Compositor Code
  6. Nouveau Turns Into A Mess In Latest Linux 3.17 + Mesa 10.3-dev Tests
  7. New GCC 5.0 Changes, Command-Line Options That Landed So Far
  8. SteamOS Update 133 Has Better Intel Performance, VA-API
  9. DRM Graphics Changes For Linux 3.18 Might End Up Being Smaller
  10. Ioquake3 Works On Finally Switching Over To SDL2
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  3. Announcing radeontop, a tool for viewing the GPU usage
  4. Users defect to Linux as OpenBSD removes Lynx from base system
  5. Chinese People Try To Patent Wine On ARM
  6. American Citizens running AMOK for food stamps
  7. "The World's Most Highly-Assured OS" Kernel Open-Sourced
  8. What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?