Originally posted by Awesomeness
View Post
KDE Amarok 2.7 Coming Very Soon With New Features
Collapse
X
-
"Note, these tests are on a 64 bit machine, so they would be about double compared to a 32 bit machine."
No, they wouldn't.
Also, unless you tested with no playlist, Clementine uses way more memory than what those tests show. I'm getting 186MB RAM usage with ~4,000 items. Amarok uses 132MB and roughly half the vitual memory.
Comment
-
-
Guest
Originally posted by YAFU View PostI'm using KDE since version 3. I do not like players covering a big annoying window. I always used Audacious (yes, gtk). It does what it have to do, play music. Small interface, filters, plugins, equalizer, playlist, and skinnable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostOfftopic: I find that when the system is under heavy HDD load I get stutters when listening to music. Yet when the system is under heavy load in windows it never stutters. As if windows gets better buffering. Does anyone else get this behavior? Is there anything I can do to increase the buffers? I use rhythmbox as of now.
edit: The pertinent kernel bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309 since 2008 >600 posts.Last edited by talvik; 11 December 2012, 09:38 AM.
Comment
-
-
I am glad to see I am not the only one who fell out of love with Amarok after 2.0 I personally don't care about how much memory it uses, for me I don't like the cluttered interface. I don't connect it to internet radio, I don't care about album cover art, I don't need to have the lyircs, ratings and statistics. For me it is all about the music, I just need a simple interface, that is why I now use the deadbeef player and I have never looked back. I can also set it up easily for bit perfect playback to my digital output. My 96Khz 24bit flac recordings have never sounded so good.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostOfftopic: I find that when the system is under heavy HDD load I get stutters when listening to music. Yet when the system is under heavy load in windows it never stutters. As if windows gets better buffering. Does anyone else get this behavior? Is there anything I can do to increase the buffers? I use rhythmbox as of now.
Quite the opposite, I was able to edit an ID3 tag in Linux without the music pausing when saving the file I was listening to. Winamp always pauses when I do that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GreatEmerald View PostYeah, no. VLC doesn't support MIDI at all. As a matter of fact, with VLC you can't even add MIDI files to the playlist. So that's not an option.
Beside that the VLC back-end never had any problems with randomly stopping playpack of MP3 files.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostVLC supports MIDI files according to http://wiki.videolan.org/Midi but one needs SoundFont files first.
Beside that the VLC back-end never had any problems with randomly stopping playpack of MP3 files.
Comment
-
-
Guest
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostOfftopic: I find that when the system is under heavy HDD load I get stutters when listening to music. Yet when the system is under heavy load in windows it never stutters. As if windows gets better buffering. Does anyone else get this behavior? Is there anything I can do to increase the buffers? I use rhythmbox as of now.
Comment
Comment