Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GeForce GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 Performance For Linux Gaming, Performance-Per-Watt

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    GeForce GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 Performance For Linux Gaming, Performance-Per-Watt

    Phoronix: GeForce GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 Performance For Linux Gaming, Performance-Per-Watt

    The latest in our benchmarking with the new GeForce GTX 1650 is some "fun" tests seeing how its performance compares to that of the GeForce GTX 650 Kepler. Various OpenGL and Vulkan Linux gaming tests were carried out as well as some compute tests and throughout monitoring the AC power consumption to yield the performance-per-Watt metrics.

    GeForce GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 Performance For Linux Gaming, Performance-Per-Watt - Phoronix
    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=27855
    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Too bad the nForce 650i wasn't included as well...

    (yes, that was sarcasm)
    • Likes 2

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by devius View Post
      Too bad the nForce 650i wasn't included as well...

      (yes, that was sarcasm)
      It was benchmarked but, being a motherboard chipset, it couldn't run the benchmarks alone.
      • Likes 1

      Comment

      • #4
        Turing rocks.

        Comment

        • #5
          The GeForce GTX 650 Kepler graphics card launched nearly seven years ago already with its 40nm GK107 GPU that provided 384 CUDA cores, 1058MHz core clock speed, and 1GB of GDDR5 video memory.
          Kepler was all 28nm

          Comment

          Previous template Next
          Working...
          X