Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SDL2 Adds Wayland HiDPI Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SDL2 Adds Wayland HiDPI Support

    Phoronix: SDL2 Adds Wayland HiDPI Support

    The ever important Simple DirectMedia Layer (SDL) can now handle HiDPI window scaling under Wayland...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    It's not about Fedora or Ubuntu. It's about compositors. The benefit of Xorg (despite all of its mess) - everyone works on the same thing, so efforts are pooled. In Wayland's world - everyone is for themselves, because all the burden is on compositors to implement core system features. That's why things are so excruciatingly slow with switch to Wayland. DEs are still basically not ready, and modern features take years to materialize.

    For Mutter, KWin, Sway and etc. it would be good if the amount of non shared effort was reduced.
    Last edited by shmerl; 12 June 2019, 01:07 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      This is really good news. One step closer to having acceptable fractional scaling support. I hope more steam games pick up more recent versions of SDL (or use the runtime one to begin with) so we can use the wayland backend.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
        It’s all about Fedora and Ubuntu. They bring the developers.
        Bring where? Fedora is mostly focused on Gnome. Ubuntu as well lately? So how for example do they bring developers for KWin, wlroots, and etc.?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
          shmerl I don’t know about those compositors. I only need one compositor. Like I only need one kernel.
          Exactly the point. You aren't the only user however, and other users have other needs.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
            Kernels are not equal. Compositors are not equal. Projects suffering from lack of resources aren’t that important. Who cares about Hurd or experimental compositors? If you want a supported compositor then Fedora or Ubuntu can provide that. Others as well.
            All projects suffer from lack of resources due to how Wayland compositors differ from Xorg. You are OK with slow development, I'm not. I think compositor developers should figure out ways to pool resources better. Wayland has its benefits, but the above is one huge downside, which they shouldn't ignore. You are delusional, if you think Wayland approach is a swap replacement for X resources wise.

            Comment


            • #7
              Funny, I'm hoping that between wlroots and Purism's work, an alternative will arise which can seamlessly replace mutter while keeping the other parts of the Gnome 3 DE under Wayland. As currently architectured and implemented, mutter is tolerable but hard to recommend for production.

              Comment


              • #8
                Here's a simple thing I really desire: FloatRect for SDL_RenderCopy.

                Comment


                • #9
                  #12
                  Mutter is already in use for production environment.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by finalzone View Post
                    #12
                    Mutter is already in use for production environment.
                    So is KWin and I'm sure others as well.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X