If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
For Archlinux it appears that this repo already provides 40 https://gitlab.com/fabis_cafe/gnome-unstable at least until the the packages appear in Arch directly. Great work GNOME people. It's a huge and good improvement. Also there are already a bunch of extensions ported. I didn't expect that. <3
I have to admit that the upgrade path was waaaay better than any major KDE version ever had. TBH I don't even understand why Canonical skipped it in the first place.
Nice! I usually skip every other Fedora release but that likely will not happen this time around. Between the constant improvements offered for AMD hardware, Gnome 40 and other goodies I'm actually very interested in the next Fedora release.
Meh, the constant UI changes make GNOME basically unusable. They want you to study and memorize all these new key combinations and desktop workflows. No thanks, I'll be sticking with the MATE Fedora spin, which has the benefit of excellent stability, predictability, and workflow continuity, which ultimately makes me more productive than any latest trendy UI flavor of the day.
Seems usable for desktop usage if you like the UI. Though on Wayland
-cursor still has input lag of a software cursor
-frame presentation with vsync < refresh rate for games in Wine/Proton looks more stuttery than it should
-grabbing scroll bar in FF Wayland isn't smooth
Not directly related to Wayland:
-changes to GPU gamma ramps still use legacy interface and thus cause missed vblanks
-Nautilus' performance of displaying folder content is still really bad
Nice progress overall, but I really hope the next version will be suited better for gaming.
Seems usable for desktop usage if you like the UI. Though on Wayland
-cursor still has input lag of a software cursor
-frame presentation with vsync < refresh rate for games in Wine/Proton looks more stuttery than it should
-grabbing scroll bar in FF Wayland isn't smooth
Not directly related to Wayland:
-changes to GPU gamma ramps still use legacy interface and thus cause missed vblanks
-Nautilus' performance of displaying folder content is still really bad
Nice progress overall, but I really hope the next version will be suited better for gaming.
Yes there are still issues, but looking at the (perfect) timing of this release, I'd consider it for enthusiasts.
I mean, the usual suspects (Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, SLES) are not going to ship the new design for months or years, giving time to smooth the many rough edges users will find.
I'm quite confident that Wayland will be mostly fine for Ubuntu 22.04, with good Nvidia support too.
If you consider this as alpha/beta software it's in pretty good shape!
Comment