Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD ROCm 5.4.2 Released As Another Small Update To The Compute Stack

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMD ROCm 5.4.2 Released As Another Small Update To The Compute Stack

    Phoronix: AMD ROCm 5.4.2 Released As Another Small Update To The Compute Stack

    ROCm 5.4 released in November with a point release then coming out in December and now there is another minor update for January to this open-source AMD Linux GPU compute stack...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Sometimes I wonder, whether hardware like Radeon Instinct MI50/MI60 is really that overpriced, making that much money, that they are worth ignoring consumers, who simply wish to be able to some computing, for fun, education or testing on there consumer graphic cards. Leaving them with no other choice but to buy NVIDIA?

    Comment


    • #3


      MIOpen finally kicks off its journey towards gfx11!

      Comment


      • #4
        The officially supported hardware by ROCm remains the Radeon Instinct MI50/MI60, Radeon VII, Radeon Pro VII, Radeon Pro W6800 series, Radeon Pro V620, and Instinct MI100/MI200 hardware. There's nothing to report yet on official RDNA3 support for ROCm.
        amd are being really slow in updating their documentation. which just isn't up to scratch to give any good representation what actually works in reality or not. and with which specific compute libraries or features. this has greatly discouraged many developers from even bothering to look at providing amd compute support. as its largely assumed not to be working... which is mostly not the case. but heh amd didnt get the memo (or their own memos). to know how important to tell us that

        however there has been a long time a tracking issue on github about it here

        I'm a long-time CUDA developer looking to explore ROCm and HIP development, but finding out which hardware even supports these tools is harder than it needs to be. Let's see... this repo's readme h...


        and coming from that issue a community member has been spending a lot of time trying to submit a table for amd to publish in their official docs (which atto still hasnt happened yet, despite being mostly complete). it seems that being perfectionists they couldn't think to just release it by now with draft written on it. and some simple * disclaimer warning text to know that some details might be incorrect or subject to change. but that's too easy. gotta make up some other superficial barrier to not tell the world until its far too late. anyhow heres the table in un-release pr form. might require some downloading of files in git. and rendering as html tables or whatever the formatting its in.

        There was a discussion about better documenting the GPU support status: #1714 This pull request makes an attempt on documenting the latest official statement on the matter by @saadrahim: #1714 (com...

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not of the field. But is AMD stack that bad compared with NVIDIA?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Volker Schmidt View Post
            Sometimes I wonder, whether hardware like Radeon Instinct MI50/MI60 is really that overpriced, making that much money, that they are worth ignoring consumers, who simply wish to be able to some computing, for fun, education or testing on there consumer graphic cards. Leaving them with no other choice but to buy NVIDIA?
            If something runs on MI50/60 it will run on the consumer equivalent (Radeon VII) as well. We don't disable consumer SKUs.

            What the MI50/60 adds is more memory, full ECC and XGMI links for connecting GPUs together.

            AFAIK the complaint is not about support for consumer equivalents to Instinct cards but rather about delays in support for consumer generations that had no data center equivalent, particularly RDNA1 and RDNA2.
            Test signature

            Comment


            • #7
              RustiCL FTW!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                If something runs on MI50/60 it will run on the consumer equivalent (Radeon VII) as well. We don't disable consumer SKUs.
                What the MI50/60 adds is more memory, full ECC and XGMI links for connecting GPUs together.
                AFAIK the complaint is not about support for consumer equivalents to Instinct cards but rather about delays in support for consumer generations that had no data center equivalent, particularly RDNA1 and RDNA2.
                my vega64 still does not work in fedora 37 ... maybe vega64 is EOL end of life and i should upgrade... but last time i checked blender and ROCm added vega64 support...

                maybe amd should do make packages for distros like fedora.
                Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bridgman View Post

                  If something runs on MI50/60 it will run on the consumer equivalent (Radeon VII) as well. We don't disable consumer SKUs.

                  What the MI50/60 adds is more memory, full ECC and XGMI links for connecting GPUs together.

                  AFAIK the complaint is not about support for consumer equivalents to Instinct cards but rather about delays in support for consumer generations that had no data center equivalent, particularly RDNA1 and RDNA2.
                  Or RDNA3. Which is really sad, considering it's AMD's first consumer GPU with AI accelerators - AI accelerators you won't be able to use until at least ROCm 5.5, which doesn't even have a tentative release window. Pytorch and Tensorflow don't work at all on RDNA3 with ROCm 5.4, not even using the RDNA2 code path. But we did get day one support for HIP this time, which is a step in the right direction and much appreciated.
                  Last edited by wsippel; 15 January 2023, 06:18 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by qarium View Post
                    my vega64 still does not work in fedora 37 ... maybe vega64 is EOL end of life and i should upgrade... but last time i checked blender and ROCm added vega64 support...
                    maybe amd should do make packages for distros like fedora.
                    Strange issue with your Vega64. I am running on AMD Ryzen 7 5825U which has a mobile Vega8 (named as AMD Radeon Graphic with rocm-opencl. Only rocm-hip-runtime has issue yet runs fine on Radeon 6950XT.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X