Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Antergos vs. Fedora vs. Ubuntu vs. openSUSE vs. Debian 9 vs. Clear Linux For Early 2017

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Antergos vs. Fedora vs. Ubuntu vs. openSUSE vs. Debian 9 vs. Clear Linux For Early 2017

    Phoronix: Antergos vs. Fedora vs. Ubuntu vs. openSUSE vs. Debian 9 vs. Clear Linux For Early 2017

    At the end of December I posted a number of Linux workstation/server distribution benchmarks while this article has the results from the more desktop-focused (non-graphics) Linux distribution benchmarks. Up for benchmarking off a Skylake NUC in this article was Antergos, Fedora 25, Ubuntu 16.10, openSUSE Tumbleweed, Debian 9 Testing, and Intel's Clear Linux.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    you have made mismatch between astergos and fedora in fact some bench missed once astergos the other fedora voices.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Azrael5 View Post
      you have made mismatch between astergos and fedora in fact some bench missed once astergos the other fedora voices.
      Huh???
      Michael Larabel
      https://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Some benchmarks are completely missing Antergos *claps*

        Some are also missing OpenSuse...did you check the graphs before posting?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gutigone View Post
          Some benchmarks are completely missing Antergos *claps*

          Some are also missing OpenSuse...did you check the graphs before posting?
          Some tests fail to build on particular platforms due to dependencies / build problems.
          Michael Larabel
          https://www.michaellarabel.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            Michael would you do that test on your AMD APU? I'm just curious how they perform (especially Intel Linux) on AMD hardware

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by lumks View Post
              Michael would you do that test on your AMD APU? I'm just curious how they perform (especially Intel Linux) on AMD hardware
              Probably when Ryzen is out, current APUs too slow to make it interesting or fun and more time consuming. Or maybe if I find myself bored and drinking beer one day and thinking what else to benchmark and run out of everything else so pull up an APU box...
              Michael Larabel
              https://www.michaellarabel.com/

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Michael View Post

                Some tests fail to build on particular platforms due to dependencies / build problems.
                And we are supposed to guess that? We don't have a crystal ball to tell us why stuff is missing, it's a common thing to actually explain why stuff is missing.

                A bunch of graphs with 1-2 lines comments isn't great content, especially since you're not even saying when something is missing because of x reason. It's filler content, it's boring, it's lifeless.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by gutigone View Post

                  And we are supposed to guess that? We don't have a crystal ball to tell us why stuff is missing, it's a common thing to actually explain why stuff is missing.

                  A bunch of graphs with 1-2 lines comments isn't great content, especially since you're not even saying when something is missing because of x reason. It's filler content, it's boring, it's lifeless.
                  The expression "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth" comes to mind...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gutigone View Post

                    And we are supposed to guess that? We don't have a crystal ball to tell us why stuff is missing, it's a common thing to actually explain why stuff is missing.

                    A bunch of graphs with 1-2 lines comments isn't great content, especially since you're not even saying when something is missing because of x reason. It's filler content, it's boring, it's lifeless.
                    Well, if something is missing from a test, what do you assume: that it hadn't completed that test or because Michael failed to include the result because reasons? Use common sense, it works wonders.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X