Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Fedora 15 Faster Than Ubuntu 11.04?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Fedora 15 Faster Than Ubuntu 11.04?

    Phoronix: Is Fedora 15 Faster Than Ubuntu 11.04?

    Ending out May, we have an interesting set of tests comparing the performance of Fedora 15 and Ubuntu 11.04. This is looking at the "out of the box" performance of both operating systems on three different systems. Not only is the actual test result looked at, but we also compared the power consumption of the two operating systems.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    boot performance???

    it would be interesting i think because of F15 using systemd

    Comment


    • #3
      Well done Michael, I think that's one of the best benchmarking articles I've read on Phoronix ever

      A good set of tests were picked, analysis was done on the data with possible explanations for discrepancies

      For once it didn't feel like a load of graphs dumped out of PTS

      More like this please

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by FireBurn View Post
        Well done Michael, I think that's one of the best benchmarking articles I've read on Phoronix ever

        A good set of tests were picked, analysis was done on the data with possible explanations for discrepancies

        For once it didn't feel like a load of graphs dumped out of PTS

        More like this please
        Thanks... For those liking the articles more than usual in recent days, it's all a matter of May was great regarding some advertising campaigns... For those that try to dismiss ads or complain about them... So just hope more like them come in June, etc.
        Michael Larabel
        https://www.michaellarabel.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          As far as the disk performance discrepancy goes - did you test with SELinux enabled or disabled, on Fedora?

          edit: you say 'out of the box', so I assume 'enabled'; it might be interesting to try with it disabled. Also it'd be interesting to know if you kept the OS default partitioning scheme (in which case the Fedora install would likely have an LVM layer the Ubuntu one would not.)

          Comment


          • #6
            Michael,

            Is PTS still self compiling the tested software?
            If so, have you considered adding, whenever possible the built in version to the mix?

            - Gilboa
            oVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
            oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
            oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
            Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.

            Comment


            • #7
              Where's the conclusion? I didn't really want to read through 6 pages..

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by AdamW View Post
                As far as the disk performance discrepancy goes - did you test with SELinux enabled or disabled, on Fedora?

                edit: you say 'out of the box', so I assume 'enabled'; it might be interesting to try with it disabled. Also it'd be interesting to know if you kept the OS default partitioning scheme (in which case the Fedora install would likely have an LVM layer the Ubuntu one would not.)
                Yes, defaults. Can do some SELinux benchmarks separately if there's interest.
                Michael Larabel
                https://www.michaellarabel.com/

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DanL View Post
                  Where's the conclusion? I didn't really want to read through 6 pages..
                  Then that detracts from ad views otherwise...
                  Michael Larabel
                  https://www.michaellarabel.com/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gilboa View Post
                    Michael,

                    Is PTS still self compiling the tested software?
                    If so, have you considered adding, whenever possible the built in version to the mix?

                    - Gilboa
                    I'd be interested in seeing this too

                    Comparing local version, compiled with local gcc and compiled with phoronix gcc too

                    That would be very interesting

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X