Intel Xeon Cascade Lake Compiler Performance - GCC 9/10 vs. LLVM Clang 8/9

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 27 June 2019 at 01:00 PM EDT. Page 2 of 6. 16 Comments.
Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

With the HPCG high performance computing benchmark, LLVM Clang produced slightly better performance over the GCC releases tested.

Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks
Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

With FFTW for this FFT benchmark, the GCC compilers were still delivering better performance particularly for larger 2D FFTs.

Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

With the HMmer molecular biology benchmark meanwhile LLVM Clang delivered better performance than GCC on this dual socket Intel Xeon server.

Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

With the SciMark 2.0 micro-benchmarks, GCC 9/10 were performing slightly better than LLVM Clang but the 9.0 Git/SVN performance is inching closer into the GNU compiler territory.

Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

LLVM Clang yielded faster performance than GCC for the TSCP chess benchmark but GCC 10.0 is in better shape after addressing a GCC 9 regression.

Cascade Lake Compiler Benchmarks

The performance flipped around yet again, for John The Ripper GCC was offering clearly better performance.


Related Articles