CentOS Stream & Clear Linux Achieve Greater Performance On 4th Gen Xeon Scalable Sapphire Rapids, EPYC Genoa

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 3 February 2023 at 08:48 AM EST. Page 6 of 6. 9 Comments.
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark benchmark with settings of Detector: Contextual Anomaly Detector OSE. Clear Linux: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
SVT-AV1 benchmark with settings of Encoder Mode: Preset 12, Input: Bosphorus 4K. CentOS Stream 9: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
Embree benchmark with settings of Binary: Pathtracer ISPC, Model: Asian Dragon. Clear Linux: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
Embree benchmark with settings of Binary: Pathtracer ISPC, Model: Crown. Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS - perf: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
MariaDB benchmark with settings of Clients: 1024. Clear Linux: Xeon 8490H 2P was the fastest.
ClickHouse benchmark with settings of 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache. CentOS Stream 9: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction. Clear Linux: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
Kvazaar benchmark with settings of Video Input: Bosphorus 4K, Video Preset: Slow. CentOS Stream 9: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
Liquid-DSP benchmark with settings of Threads: 240, Buffer Length: 256, Filter Length: 57. Clear Linux: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.
uvg266 benchmark with settings of Video Input: Bosphorus 4K, Video Preset: Medium. Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS - perf: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.

For those wondering about the out-of-the-box Linux performance for popular choices like CentOS Stream or Ubuntu on Intel Xeon Sapphire Rapids and AMD Genoa, hopefully these results were of use to you. In the case of Ubuntu it certainly pays off switching to the performance governor -- especially on the Intel side with a more pronounced difference of Intel P-State powersave compared to the AMD schedutil numbers. As well these benchmark results were very interesting for looking at the Intel Clear Linux performance on Sapphire Rapids (and Genoa) for when the OS has been extensively tuned for AVX-512 and able to make use of such optimized libraries out-of-the-box when running on capable x86_64 processors. In total I ran 112 benchmarks for this comparison and you can see all of the individual benchmark results in full here.

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results benchmark with settings of Result Composite, Sapphire Rapids   AMD Genoa, CentOS Stream 9, Clear Linux, Ubuntu. Clear Linux: EPYC 9654 2P was the fastest.

When taking the geometric mean of all the benchmarks that ran successfully in all configurations, here's how things break down. Intel's Clear Linux was easily the fastest Linux OS tested for both 4th Gen Xeon Scalable and 4th Gen EPYC. With the dual Xeon Platinum 8490H processors, Clear Linux was 16% faster than CentOS Stream 9 as the second place finisher. With the dual AMD EPYC 9654 server, Clear Linux was 18.5% faster than CentOS Stream 9. On both servers CentOS Stream 9 came out slightly faster than Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS when running in the performance governor mode. When running Ubuntu out-of-the-box with its default governors, switching to the performance governor for Sapphire Rapids led to a 37% increase in performance where on the AMD side changing from the Ubuntu schedutil default to performance made just an 8% improvement.

CPU Power Consumption Monitor benchmark with settings of Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring.

Lastly is a look at the CPU power consumption across the entire span of benchmarks conducted. While Intel's Clear Linux had a very pronounced lead over the other distributions, overall its power consumption on both the AMD EPYC and Intel Xeon Scalable servers wasn't that different. The overall power consumption was similar to that of Ubuntu (with performance governor) and CentOS Stream 9 while delivering much better performance.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.