180+ Benchmarks On Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 Against Debian Buster Testing

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 15 December 2018 at 12:35 PM EST. Page 5 of 5. 9 Comments.

Numpy is looking good on Debian Buster!

The x265 video encode performance is much faster with the newer Debian Testing on GCC8.

Debian Buster performance is looking pretty good! Of the 183 benchmarks run, Debian Buster Testing was faster in 121 of the cases... Granted, some of the tests where Buster was losing out were scenarios like timed code compilation where understandably the newer GCC compiler is producing code slower than the former due to more optimization passes, etc. Those wishing to dig through this plethora of Debian Linux benchmarking data can find it on OpenBenchmarking.org.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
Ubuntu 24.04 Boosts Performance, Outperforming Windows 11 On The AMD Ryzen Framework 16 Laptop
Ubuntu 24.04 Brings Some Performance Gains For AMD Threadripper 7980X / System76 Thelio Major
Intel's Linux Software Optimizations Continue Paying Off Big Time For Xeon Emerald Rapids
Ampere Altra Max Performance For Ubuntu Linux 22.04 vs. 23.10 vs. 24.04
Ubuntu 24.04 Helping Achieve Greater Performance On Intel Xeon Scalable Emerald Rapids
CentOS Stream ISA Optimized Packages Show Great Results On Intel Xeon Emerald Rapids
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.