Intel Arc Graphics A580 / A750 / A770 Linux Performance For Early 2024

Written by Michael Larabel in Graphics Cards on 2 February 2024 at 01:00 PM EST. Page 2 of 6. 10 Comments.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark with settings of Resolution: 1920 x 1080. RTX 4090 was the fastest.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme at 1080p is hardly interesting for top-end NVIDIA/AMD GPUs but is a good stressor still for Intel DG2/Alchemist hardware. The Intel Arc Graphics A770 here were performing around the speed of the GeForce RTX 4060 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The A750 meanwhile was around the speed of the Radeon RX 7600 and the A580 around an RX 6600 / RTX 3060.

The A770 wasn't exposing working power sensors on the kernel version tested while the A580 and A750 were working out fine... But DG2/Alchemist still struggles in terms of power efficiency with being comparable to the RDNA1 graphics cards tested.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark with settings of Resolution: 2560 x 1440. RTX 4090 was the fastest.

Running 3DMark at 1440p on Linux saw the Arc A770 competing now with the RX 7600 XT.

GravityMark benchmark with settings of Resolution: 1920 x 1080, Renderer: Vulkan. RX 7900 XTX was the fastest.

The Intel ANV Vulkan driver continues to perform abnormally poor for the GravityMark benchmark... At least it runs though unlike NVIDIA where I seem to have an issue still with frequent hangs.

GravityMark benchmark with settings of Resolution: 1920 x 1080, Renderer: Vulkan Ray-Tracing. RX 7900 XTX was the fastest.

GravityMark with Vulkan ray-tracing doesn't work out any better for the Intel Arc Graphics on Mesa 24.1-devel.

10 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page