Radeon Vulkan Driver Benchmarks: AMDVLK 2018.4.2 vs. AMDGPU-PRO 18.40 vs. Mesa 18.2/19.0

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 25 November 2018 at 12:00 PM EST. Page 5 of 5. 38 Comments.
AMDGPU-PRO 18.40 vs. AMDVLK 2018.4.2 vs. Mesa 19.0
AMDGPU-PRO 18.40 vs. AMDVLK 2018.4.2 vs. Mesa 19.0

With Total War: WARHAMMER II it was just released for Linux this past week. While both AMD and the Mesa developers generally have early access to new Feral game ports, we haven't seen any AMDGPU-PRO/AMDVLK updates mention any changes specific to this game. For this at-launch support, the Mesa performance was in the slight lead.

AMDGPU-PRO 18.40 vs. AMDVLK 2018.4.2 vs. Mesa 19.0
AMDGPU-PRO 18.40 vs. AMDVLK 2018.4.2 vs. Mesa 19.0

At ultra quality settings, Mesa RADV was still leading over AMDVLK/AMDGPU-PRO.

For pre-Vega Radeon hardware, the Mesa RADV Vulkan driver performance remains mostly on-par with the AMDVLK Vulkan driver performance but for some games AMDGPU-PRO is still the fastest option with its proprietary shader compiler. AMD developers have said they plan to switch over to using the AMDGPU LLVM back-end for all their drivers in the future, but at this point it's still not as mature as their closed-source code. Particularly for the Radeon RX Vega graphics cards, there still appears to be quite a bit of room to optimize the RADV/LLVM performance.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.